1. Absolved from seeking equality by the Parable of the Workers?This morning I rode the 122 bus from State/Wacker to it's end near the Northwestern train station. It seems to be a phantom route, as I can't even locate it on the
CTA map. Therefore, I also don't know exactly where it starts, but for whatever reason, a large majority of the passengers on this bus were people of color. This observation was in stark contrast to some other bus experiences I've had traveling on express routes from Lakeview to downtown, where at least eighty percent of the passengers were Caucasian.
For better or for worse, my unscientific observation of Chicago's persistent segregation is nothing new. However, when I started to feel something cold and wet hitting my hand on the 122 this morning, I was forced to ask why it had never snowed inside the comfy articulating buses that I used to ride from Lakeview. (Seriously. Snowing inside the bus.) Could it be that the CTA was sending nicer buses on those routes?
After swallowing this snowflake-sized pill of inequality, I recalled a recent conversation about fairness in reference to the
Parable of the Workers. If a person has received what he or she has agreed to, in this case a ride from A to B for $1.75, then what difference should it make how much better or worse another person's deal may be?
The analogy fails in the fact that no one opted for a snow-globe bus ride (unless they thought it was some special power of the Knight Bus), but here comes my bigger question...
It sounds so unsympathetic and unkind, but if fully accepted, does the Parable of the Workers entitle us to stop caring about inequality? Should each of us just be content with or grateful for where we and others are in our individual lives, and stop worrying about the outcomes presented to others regardless of whether they're better or worse than our own?
The question's setup is a little vague because I had one other commute-inspired idea, but I'd welcome your thoughts anyway.
2. Could I be a happy Sisyphus to the corporate authorities?Last night on the train home, I saw a middle-aged man entering sales figures into a CDW database from his laptop. My immediate thought was, "Ugh. I don't think I could ever stomach such corporate drudgery." But rather than settling on my first impression, I turned and asked Brenda how she thought I'd do.
We both agreed that my beef with authority would present some major obstacles, but I recalled an article from
Inc. Magazine several years ago that pointed out how no person ever entirely avoids authority. We'll always have a superordinate, a shareholder, or even a customer who must be appeased.
In the face of this inevitable subordination sentence, I recalled Camus'
Myth of Sisyphus. The philosopher suggests that the mythic hero's only remaining choice in the face of his eternal condemnation to rolling a rock uphill is to revolt by choosing to be happy.
Keeping Sisyphus' internal revolution in mind, I wonder if I really could handle a career in a big corporate setting. Then again, a good friend of my parents once said that I'd be perfectly happy making a living scraping bugs off of windshields. (A sign of imbalance? Perhaps.)
I'll conclude by stealing Camus' closing:
"The struggle itself is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy."